The world is slowly creeping toward the long-awaited and long-feared Iran War. What is this ‘Iran War?” At some point, Iran will be attacked, most likely by Israel, perhaps less likely by the United States or some coalition of Western powers. But the ongoing concerns regarding Iran’s continued nuclear weapons development and the collapse of any reasonable diplomatic scenarios will lead Israel’s leadership with the belief that they have no choice but to strike the Islamic Republic of Iran before they can attack Israel with the nuclear weapons Iran is developing.
Two recent developments in particular shows that Israel is growing increasingly concerned. First, the Israeli cabinet decided to fund a program to provide gas masks to all Israelis. This is an obvious preparation for the possibility of missile attacks on Israel from Iran and/or Iranian allies Hamas, Hezbollah, and Syria.
Second, on January 12, 2010, a leading Iranian nuclear scientist was assassinated by a remote-controlled bomb in Tehran. It is widely assumed that Israel is behind this killing in an apparent attempt to delay the Iranian nuclear program.
See also: http://www.historyguy.com/iranwar.htm
Iran is far from a homogenous nation. The Islamic Republic has many ethnic and religious minority groups, and many of them chafe under Tehran’s rule. The Baluchis of southeastern Iran (like their ethnic kin across the border in Pakistani Baluchistan), want freedom from the central government, and are conducting a guerrilla/terrorist war to achieve their goals.
Iran’s ethnic and political unrest escalated on October 17, 2009, with a suicide bombing that killed at least five commanders of Iran’s elite Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps. The bombings also killed and wounded dozens of others left dead and injured in two the restive Baluchi region of near Iran’s southeastern frontier with Pakistan.
The coordinated suicide bomb attacks mark an escalation in hostilities between Iran’s leadership and one of the nation’s many restive ethnic and religious minorities, in this case the Baluchis. Many terrorist attacks, mostly directed at the Iranian military and at the Revolutionary Guard have plagued Iran’s southeastern region, Sistan-Baluchistan, and in April the government put the elite but brutal Revolutionary Guards Corps in control of security in the Baluchi region in an effort to stop the escalating violence.
Iran, predictably, has accused its foreign enemies of supporting the insurgents in the past, and repeated that charge the day after the latest attack. By midday, news reports from Iran said that 31 people were killed and at least 28 injured.
See also:
http://www.historyguy.com/iran_baluchistan_rebellion_war.htm
http://www.historyguy.com/iranwar.htm
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/19/world/middleeast/19iran.html
The news out of the Pittsburgh G-20 Summit about the hitherto secret Iranian nuclear facility, coupled with Iranian missile tests near the Yom Kippur Jewish holiday raise the fears of a Western Powers/Israeli pre-emptive attack on Iran.
See http://www.historyguy.com/iranwar.htm for more information and links.
The Iran War Scenarios and Analysis page is now up and running. This page will track current news, rumors, and analysis related to possible attacks on Iran by the United States and/or Israel.
New page on the recent political violence in Iran and in Tehran at http://www.historyguy.com/iran_unrest_2009.htm
Iran Wars page updated due to the rising tensions surrounding the disputed Iranian Presidential election and the possible scenarios involving an Israeli attack on Iran in the near future.
Go to: http://www.historyguy.com/wars_of_iran.htm
for more information on the military history of Persia and Iran, and the military history of this ancient nation.
The American helicopter raid into Syria this week which targeted an al-Qaida leader based there, may presage a similar attack into Iran in the near future. Just as missile strikes and a very similar commando raid into Pakistan's border region in September may have foreshadowed this raid into Syria's border area, the next logical target in the ongoing attempt to curtail cross-border aid and supply to al-Qaida and other insurgents into Iraq may be Iran.
Many analysts and pundits have mulled over the possibility of an "October Surprise" in the middle east which could affect the American Presidential race. The theory being that an international crisis or event could highlight the foreign policy experience of John McCain over his opponent, Barack Obama. Also, if a major military event took place, the American public may automatically back the party in power (the Republican), and this close to Election Day, that may translate into more votes for McCain.
This theory is faulty on several fronts. First, the economy will continue to be Issue #1, and little short of a major terror attack on the U.S. homeland will change that. Second, at this point in the war and in the election campaign, the American public would likely turn on the Bush Administration and, by extension, John McCain if it perceived an attempt to manipulate the election with the lives of American service members.
And then there is the real danger. George W. Bush and Dick Cheney have been clear that they view the development of Iranian nuclear weapons to be a grave and mortal danger the the United States and its allies, particularly Israel. Rather than start something with Iran before the election, in what the history books and public opinion would surely condemn as a blatant and heavy-handed attempt to influence the election, it is far more likely that the long-feared "Iran War" will begin after Barack Obama wins the election, which, as of this writing, seems very likely to occur.
Were McCain to take office, Bush and Cheney would likely feel assured that their policies on Iran and the nuclear issue would be carried on by McCain. The same is not true of a likely Obama Administration. Thus, in order to save America, Israel, and much of Europe from a nuclear-armed Iran, it is highly likely that at some point in the 77 day transition period between Election Day and Inauguration Day, an incident will occur, or a commando raid similar to those carried out on Pakistan and Syria will take place on Iranian soil. Or, Israel may elect to attack Iran itself, with the full assurance of American support and involvement.
If Obama wins, watch for signs of military buildup and preparation. This Iran War scenario is all the more likely after the raids on Pakistan and Syria. After all, what do President Bush and Vice-President Cheney have to worry about if the American public disapproves of such a war? Elect them out of office? President Obama may be faced with a much more dangerous, chaotic, and violent world than now exists.
Signs point to a possible U.S./NATO/Israeli war against Iran/Syria/Hezbollah in the near future.
Tensions between Israel and Syria escalated in early April as Israel conducts nation-wide civil defense drills simulating a domestic response to a potential Hezbollah/Syrian/Iranian attack with biological and chemical weapons. This drill comes amid continued Hezbollah threats to avenge the recent assassination of one of its leaders. Supposedly in response to Israel’s drill, Syria has put its military on alert.
In addition, Israel recently conducted a joint naval exercise with NATO forces in the Mediterranean Sea. France, Britain, Germany and other NATO nations, including the U.S. have been warning of Iran’s nuclear ambitions this past year.
It is widely assumed in the U.S. and throughout the world, that the Bush/Cheney Administration, unsure of John McCain’s chances of beating the Democrats for the White House, and unwilling to leave a potentially nuclear Iran to be dealt with by an Obama or Clinton administration, will do whatever it takes to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons. As of April, 2008, only ten months remain for President Bush to act. Also, a preemptive war against Iran, if it goes well (a decidedly big IF), will likely boost Senator McCain’s chances against the presumed Clinton and/or Obama Democratic ticket in November.
The recent removal of Admiral Fallon, a critic of a potential Iran War, also clears the way within the military leadership for a fully-supported effort to exercise the will of the Commander-in-Chief.
Time will tell if this war scenario plays out, but the odds are heavily stacked in favor of a wider regional war pitting the Western allies (plus Israel) against Iran, Syria, and Hezbollah.
Links and Sources:
Syria Plans Emergency Drill amid Fears of War with Israel–Voice of America, April 9, 2008
Israeli intel projects a one-month war with Syria–World Tribune.com, April 9, 2008
US Military Strike set on Iran? by W. Joseph Stroupe of the International Analyst Network, April 7, 2008
Turkish forces bombed Kurdish PKK rebels based in northern Iraq in aerial attacks on December 1st and on December 16th, with both attacks aided by intelligence supplied by the United States. Earlier in the Autumn, Turkey hinted at an invasion of northern Iraq to get at the rebels, a move opposed by both the U.S. and the Iraqi government.
While the Turks are within their rights to strike at an enemy combatant force with whom they have been at war with since the 1980s, the U.S. is not the sovereign power in Iraq; officially, sovereign power rests with the Iraqi government in Baghdad, and reports indicate that the government, especially the Kurdish members of the government are quite angry at this attack and at U.S. complicity.
While the U.S. can claim that it is aiding a fellow NATO member defend itself, and that the PKK is considered a terrorist group, allowing the Turks to strike inside Iraq does open up the question of what the Bush Administration would do if Iran launched a similar cross-border strike against their own Kurdish rebels who also use northern Iraq as a base.
U.S. Helps Turkey Hit Rebel Kurds In Iraq: Intelligence Role Could Complicate Diplomacy–Washington Post Staff, December 18, 2007
Turkey’s U.S.-Backed Strike in Iraq–Time, Dec. 17, 2007
Recent events in the Middle East and elsewhere raise the question, not of if, but when, a U.S.-led war on Iran will begin.
Some points to ponder:
1. Turkey (an Iran neighbor) is threatening to attack Kurdish rebel (PKK) bases in northern Iraq (also an Iran neighbor).
2. Iran has recently been shelling Kurdish rebel (PEJAK) bases in northern Iraq.
3. Recent war fears related to the Turkey/Kurd conflict pushed oil prices past the $90 a barrel mark.
4. Evidence mounts that Vice-President Dick Cheney is urging President Bush to launch a war on Iran prior to Jan. 20, 2008, when they both must leave office to make way for the new president. Most likely such an attack on Iran will take place after the election, so as to not affect the Republican nominee’s chances of winning. See Rolling Stone Magazine’s recent article. Znet, Atlantic Free Press
5. Some conspiracy theorists contend that the recent revelation of an unauthorized nuclear-armed B-52 flight across the United States was not truly some kind of incredible error or once-in-a-lifetime chain of events leading to a huge mistake, but a part of some conspiracy or cover-up. One theory is that the nuclear-tipped cruise missiles were intended for the Middle East and for targets in Iran, and that the flight to Louisiana was some sort of quiet "rebellion" in the ranks of the Air Force. See
6. Israel’s recent air strike on Syria looks more and more like an Osirak-style raid to stop an Arab nation from acquiring nuclear weapons. The New York Times and ABC News report that the target in Syria was a nuclear facility being built with North Korean aid.
7. Iran and Russia are getting cozy, and Russia is Iran’s main supplier of weapons. The Bush administration may be tempted to attack Iran soon, before the Moscow-Tehran relationship turns into a real alliance.
The world is at a vital turning point. A U.S. attack on Iran could have serious consequences for the entire world. These recent events show that strange things are occurring and the world public is left wondering. We shall see what the future holds…